Home

Advertisement

Customize
It is not the function of our government to keep the citizens from falling into error, it is the function of the citizens to keep the government from falling into error.

-Robert H. Jackson, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1950

Links:
Past Quotes
Current Month
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031
Dec. 28th, 2009 @ 03:52 pm Barbarian Nonsense



Did I ever mention how much I hate China?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091228/ap_on_re_as/as_china_britain_death_sentence


Actually, China's not alone in this barbarity. Many Asian nations execute people over things that would get them a few years in prison in the US, at most. I'm talking drug trafficking, of course; I'm sorry, but I consider how we treat the helpless- and that includes prisoners who are incapacitated totally- as the supreme sign of what level of civilization we have achieved.

Fuck China. They've gone from being one of the world's oldest and most brilliant civilizations to being an officially atheist toilet bowl with billions of people and corruption beyond measure in charge of their sorry excuse for a government. Their corruption makes USA corruption look like an episode of Mr. Roger's Neighborhood.

But truly, is Texas any better? They just executed a man whose IQ tested in the range of mentally handicapped. Fuck Texas! I wish they would succeed from the "union", such that it is. I think of them as an embarrassment that produced the Bush family.

Good thing I'm not the British Government, because I'd take better care of my citizens. I'd issue a travel advisory for all Brits telling them the truth: If you travel in these barbaric, backwards-assed Asian nations, you may be murdered by the governments there if you do something you wouldn't be murdered for here. (Some of the fools here who may want to argue with me about this execution being a "murder" can be silenced now- morally unjustifiable killing is always murder, even if a barbaric law-code says that it's an acceptable legal penalty.) And if I were the King of England, or the PM, or some important Brit with a Brit accent, I'd send the Special Air Services to the ass-smelling shantytown that this man is being held in, and have them extract him by force (there's almost no chance of them failing).

And I'd tell China that I did it, after the fact, and expel their "diplomats" and cut off all relations with them over this. Yes, over one citizen of my country would I say "fuck you". That's just the resentful sort of bastard I am. I would never allow my citizens to be subjected to kangaroo courts and murder at the hands of thugs and barbarians. I'd be happy to have him sent back to England to face charges of drug trafficking in his home country, however. If the Chinese justice system was worth anything, and not a joke on the world Human Rights stage, I might be inclined to allow my citizens to be subjected to it. But what's happening here is a bigger crime, a far bigger crime than what China claims this man did.

This all comes down to the foolish, backwards, vicious, and useless penalty of death, of capital punishment in general. There's no use for it anymore. It's bullying, it's vengeance, it's useless. It doesn't deter crime, as studies have revealed. I only consider it to be worthwhile in one instance, the instance of the murder of children- but some here (mostly non-parents) would disagree with me on this one. That's fine. These situations are complicated, but in the end, capital punishment as a whole reeks.

China is an embarrassment to humanity, sorta like Texas, except WAY bigger, WAY more people, and WAY more executions. Bullying and barbarity and corruption and violence-for-pleasure seeking power-drunk GOONS everywhere... funny thing, this: do any of you remember when you became an adult?

What marked your real mental transition from a child's worldview to an "adult" worldview? I know when mine was. I remember it. I realized one day, while watching some horrible shit on the news, that adults weren't in charge of the world. My mother couldn't explain to me why someone wouldn't come and stop the terrible things I was seeing, the crying, scared people huddling for shelter from whatever thug or tyrant was murdering them in some country a world away.

When you're growing up, most people rely on the "adults", you think they have it under control, that they keep shit straight, and don't let things happen in terrible, unfair, unjust ways. They punish you for being unfair and a bully; you have to assume that no one does this stuff in the adult world.

One day, I realized that even adults didn't have this world under control. They were as helpless as me, a child, to stop terrible things, unfair things, unjust things, and that adults everywhere who were in control of cities, countries, and armies were not fair people or good people. They could be worse than any bully kid, more immature and stupid than the worst kid. When I realized that this world wasn't in the hands of benevolent, calm, fair adults, I think I stopped being a "kid". Adults played their hand well- they made me think that cops and lawyers and politicians sorta had things handled, but they don't. They never did. And other nations? Asspounding barbarians and power-hungry petty tyrants who kill or send to death and laugh about it.

There's no dignity out there, waiting for kids who are growing up, just teeth and talons and a struggle for safety and justice which is akin to reaching a mirage in a burning desert.
About this Entry
[info]owl_clan, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 27th, 2009 @ 09:01 pm (no subject)
(I thought this applied since Buddhism has a lot to do with being Present)

Has anyone else read The Power of Now by Eckhart Tolle? What did you think of it? Have you applied anything to your life from the book? What changes have you noticed in your life?
About this Entry
[info]circebe, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 27th, 2009 @ 11:10 pm Gatekeeper Death Disguise
Blasphemer: Gatekeeper, is death your disguise?
Gatekeeper: Answers are the Echos of the Dead
Cult Followers: The Dead Know The Answers of The Echos

Blasphemer: Death, do you control the Gatekeeper
Death: I am Alive
Gatekeeper: Screams of a Soul Torn Asunder
Cult Followers: We have with us a Power

Blasphemer: I shall rend your locks useless, and knowledge shall flow free
Death: I have killed the Gatekeeper
Cult Followers: We shall drown the heathen in the lake of Gestalts
Gatekeeper: Seeking a new Gestalt

Blashpemer: I am a Blasphemer and I tear Your Gates Asunder
Cult Followers: Neither Blasphemy Nor Gates Quench Our Thirst Completely

-Noize-: Everlasting Death Echoes In The Lost Myriad Of Gestalts Form The Background Of The Meditational Mandalas
About this Entry
[info]satan_hitler, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 27th, 2009 @ 08:05 pm Who'se mother here is a bitch?
My mother looks like Ms. Piggy. She came over yesterday, and flapped her arms. Then she breathed this NASTY DISGUSTING breath on me.
(I chased that old witch right back to her car.... twice.... yet, it was too late)

I spent the rest of the day vomiting blood out of my nose. I called my mom to tell her what a witch she was and she said -you have Swine Flu-!

(cause she looks like a pig and flapped her arms?)

I don't know who thinks this kind of shit is funny, though when I was a baby, my mom used to tell me bedtime stories that involved everyone else shitting their pants and getting hosed down cause they smell bad.

I don't know what this has to do with anything, though I've never vomited blood out my nose before yesterday.
Anyone else here have a mother who is a witch?
About this Entry
[info]satan_hitler, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 27th, 2009 @ 08:47 am I'm so lucky!
Because I have awesome friends who are awesome, I now own not one but TWO Doctor Who DVD sets - series 2 and 3!

They tend to run expensive here in the states - upwards of $70, but Amazon had a sale, and I got lucky because I have, as I said, awesome friends who love me. And get me.

On Amazon, however, they are still less expensive than usual ($41.00) and my sister gave me a $30 Amazon gift card, so I am planning on getting myself one more. I'm leaning toward Series 1, but am idly wondering if I should get 4, then I'll have the majority of DT's stuff*.

What do you think, flist? Series 1 or 4?



*I do wonder how they'll package Series 5 - lots of extra space there.
About this Entry
[info]charliesmum
Dec. 27th, 2009 @ 10:46 pm Ballet in front of the Buddha.
I watched some ballet this afternoon performed in front of a Buddha statue.

Photobucket
About this Entry
[info]ocha_no_hanashi, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 27th, 2009 @ 12:14 pm Enlightenment
First Hit's Free.... and, unlike Crack, they're all free.
God The Devil And Bob )
About this Entry
[info]satan_hitler, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 27th, 2009 @ 02:32 am Sinhala Buddhist Monks Attack a Tamil Church In Srilanka JHU Party, Colombo Nov 05,09


Is this real? Any credible info on why monks would attack this particular church?

I am against religous discrimination in any form. I hope this madness stops and freedom is granted to religous minorities in Lanka.

Update: I found some more detail today, including some transcripts: http://persecutedchurch.blogspot.com/2009/11/buddhist-monks-attack-on-sri-lankan.html .

Btw. Good job Robin! Really entertaining to see how dead-buddha reacts to your posts.
About this Entry
[info]markcl, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 26th, 2009 @ 08:41 pm Fazang on śrāvaka precepts.
The following is a brief excerpt from Fazang's commentary on the Brahma Net Sutra's Bodhisattva vows 梵網經菩薩戒本疏 (T1813).

第二諸藏所攝者。

II. Contents of the Stores

此有四重。

This has four layers.

初約二藏有二。

1. Concerning the two stores having two [layers].

謂大小二乘各有菩薩藏聲聞藏。於此四中唯大乘內菩薩藏攝。

These are said to be the Mahayana, the Hinayana and the two vehicles each having the Bodhisattva store and the śrāvaka store. Within these four it is only within the Mahayana that the Bodhisattva store is [completely] contained.

或通大乘聲聞藏攝。

Some permeate through the Mahayana and are contained in the śrāvaka store.

以大中聲聞悉許成佛。於此戒法亦受持故。

Because within the Mahayana the śrāvaka are all able to become Buddhas, these [śrāvaka] vows are also maintained.

亦通收小中菩薩。以彼三十四心成佛等事、離此實戒更無餘故。

[The Mahayana] also passes through and absorbes the Bodhisattva [stages] contained within the lesser [vehicle]. This is because outside the actual vows of those thirty-four [states of] mind, achieving Buddhahood, and such things, there are furthermore no other [practises].

或亦通彼聲聞藏。以七眾所持、別解脫戒、皆是菩薩律儀攝故。是故彼法亦在此中。

Some also pass through the śrāvaka store. This is because of the different liberation vows which the seven assemblies all maintain are all subsumed within the Bodhisattva disciplinary regulations. Thus those [śrāvaka] teachings are also within this one.






There are two interesting things I'd like to point out.

The first is that the statement "...within the Mah
āyāna the śrāvaka are all able to become Buddhas..." is an idea drawn from the Lotus Sutra where Hīnayāna practitioners are also said to eventually achieve Buddhahood. This was something that Mahāyāna thinkers differed on amongst themselves. Some thought that Hīnayāna practitioners would achieve Arhatship and enter Parinirvāṇa never to return. Others proposed that Arhatship was only temporary, albeit a fairly long, stage and that eventually all beings without exception including Arhats would achieve final unexcelled Buddhahood. It is evident that Fazang was in favour of the later theory.

The second relevant point here is that Fazang is in full support of a
Mahāyāna Bodhisattva aspirant observing the śrāvaka precepts. At first that sounds like common sense, but we should keep in mind that only a few decades prior there was Daoxuan, a noted scholar and advocate of the Vinaya, who complained of Mahāyāna practitioners disregarding the Hīnayāna precepts.


《四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔》卷2:「今時不知教者。多自毀傷云。此戒律所禁止。是聲聞之法。於我大乘棄同糞土。猶如黃葉木牛木馬誑止小兒。此之戒法亦復如是。誑汝聲聞子也。」(CBETA, T40, no. 1804, p. 49, b27-c1)

In present times many of those who do not know the teachings destroy and injure themselves saying,"What this Vinaya prohibits is a
śrāvaka teaching. For our Mahāyāna we toss it away just like dirty soil. Just like yellow leaves, a wooden cow or a wooden horse deceive a little child, these precept teachings are like this. They deceive you little śrāvaka!"


One can gather from Daoxuan's writings that in his day, which was only a generation or two before Fazang, that some Buddhist monks in China did not actually observe the Vinaya. It should be noted that during the Tang dynasty there were many "monks" who bought their ordination certificates and engaged in questionable and immoral activities and businesses. There was something of a mirror monastic community that was really just a refuge for those wanting to avoid mandatory civil labour duties and taxation. It was something of an ongoing problem throughout the Tang dynasty and it resulted in more and more regulations and restrictions being placed on monastics eventually resulting in the great repression of 845.

I would venture to say that Fazang was aware of this problem and thus in his commentary on
Mahāyāna precepts he also indicated that Mahāyāna vows also by default include the Hīnayāna precepts as well so a monk is obligated to conduct himself in line with the Vinaya.
About this Entry
[info]ocha_no_hanashi, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 25th, 2009 @ 11:47 pm Well that didn't take long.
Yep, screw christmas, I'm done.

We had a pretty good time at our annual christmas party last night, though really it's just the usual inter-family chill session with some presents added in. Today, however, has been less than ideal.

I went downstairs to get christmas stuff going, and we started getting the presents out just in time for my mom to get a phone call from one of her most depressing friends. He's a vietnam veteran with a million problems, and every time he calls he sucks the energy out of everyone at the house. It's nice to hear from him, but every call is a litany of one bad thing after another. The most recent is that his exposure to agent orange while he was deployed has recently caused him to become a diabetic, so on top of all his other issues, he now has to manage diabetes. Also he's working on Christmas, out on an oil rig in the middle of the ocean.

So, that sucked a bit of the life out of the room, but after that was done, we got back and started unwrapping presents. We got about two presents in, and our roommate came walking up the path to the house and started swearing at the top of his lungs. My mom went out to make sure he was okay, and he fell through the front door and landed face down in the entryway. We all stood around for a few minutes trying to figure out what to do, while my mom tried to get some sort of answer out of him about how he was or if there was some problem (besides him being drunk and face down on the floor). He alternated between crying and saying that he just needed to go back up to his room, and after a few minutes we hefted him upright and he somehow managed to navigate up the stairs to his room, where he passed out on the bed. We wiped up some blood from a cut on his forehead (probably from falling through the doorway) and eventually went back to open christmas presents finally, though my mom spent the whole rest of the day stewing.

He was up and around after a few hours- his sister came over to pick him up for another family dinner that he had to get to. Oh, my mom told me later that apparently he threw up all over the bathroom too. Probably in his room too, though we won't know about that until he comes back and tries to surreptitiously ask about where the cleaning supplies are.

I'm not too wigged out about it... not nearly as much as my mom. She's already thinking that he's pretty well worn out his welcome. His mom died after a lifetime of ill health just last week, and it's christmas. As far as I'm concerned, that's a get-out-of-jail free card for something like today. In general he's been drinking less and seemingly trying to be less of a fuckup. He always pays the rent on time, and hardly uses any of the house. He doesn't generally make much of a mess, either. The only problems so far have been booze related- this and a few other times he's been over-sauced, and the liquor in our liquor cabinet that disappeared after he moved in (though at this house we have yet to have a roommate who doesn't at some point help themselves to our booze without asking). I would disagree with kicking him out based on today. Then again I'm 25, and having people I know pass out and throw up on themselves is somewhat more understandable. He's nearly 60, and less responsible with himself than anyone I know was, even back into their childhood.

Having had both an alcoholic husband and father, my mom is pretty sensitive to anything involving someone drinking to the point of incoherency. As I mentioned, she's already simmering about it, even if I think she's a little bit on the unreasonable side. As I mentioned, his mom just died earlier in the week, and it seemed like he was really trying to improve his general life. If he can unfuck himself somewhat or at least keep his alcoholism inside the four walls of his room and do his decomposition in there, he's a fine roommate.

We'll see what happens from now on. He'll probably be sequestered at his family's for a few days, since my mom mentioned what had happened to his sister when she came to pick him up, and the family will hopefully do their best to impress upon him the need for him to straighten up, or at the very least keep an eye on him for a few days to try to give my mom a chance to simmer down.

So yeah, christmas over at that point. Fortunately I got pulled away to see Vanessa's family, which is normally something I'd sweat, but it was certainly preferable to sitting around talking about the roommate situation all day. The rest of the day was pretty good- TV had a Mythbusters marathon and played all of the Pixar shorts, followed by The Incredibles, which they stretched out to three hours with commercials.

So yeah, now I can do something fun- like working a million hours this week in the post-christmas rush, which will at least get me out of the house.

Oh, also my cat has worms, which I discovered the best way. (Having a worm crawl out of his butt while my girlfriend is squeezing him with hugs.)

So, long story short: :|
About this Entry
[info]patchworkhero
Dec. 25th, 2009 @ 12:14 pm (no subject)
So, was Seculanta Claus good to y'all this year?
About this Entry
[info]patchworkhero
Dec. 25th, 2009 @ 12:34 am people get ready

here's my christmas gospel song :)
About this Entry
[info]tropical_hermit
Dec. 24th, 2009 @ 10:39 pm in which I am an insufferable hippie
Hello, dharma pals. =) I have a very mundane question for you.

I meditate with a Vipassana sangha on Sundays. On the first Sunday of every month there's a little potluck afterward. I ordinarily flee from this event, as I'm not very imaginative where food is concerned. Every once in a strange while, though, I like to make tea eggs. Making them is joyful to me, like a little ritual. The boiling tea/spice/soy mixture perfumes my apartment, and the eggs come out looking like marble. I've just gotten some eggs from a local farm with free-range chickens. So just now, I thought: say, wouldn't some locally/humanely-sourced tea eggs be lovely funny things to bring to sangha potluck?

But then I thought hrm, not vegan. Would that be Not OK? I know the snacks people bring are always vegetarian, but vegan I'm not sure. I will first carefully gauge the level of ova-consumption among my fellow sitters so I don't make a terrible faux pas. In the meantime, though, I just thought I'd bounce it off you guys. This is not an invitation to debate the role of veg*nism in Buddhism! It's just a question about wanting to offer something, and not wanting to disrespect others in doing so.

What do you think? Skilled? Or OMG So Not? I know that folks will probably respect my intentions, but still. One likes to get it right the first time if one can.
About this Entry
[info]salami_salome, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 25th, 2009 @ 03:02 am Serious Considerations
Ethylene Vinyl Acetate. This chemical is now added to cigarette paper to make it extinguish itself. This chemical does not yield to the metabolism. This is a direct attack on the health and well being of the population.
tl;dr )
About this Entry
[info]satan_hitler, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 24th, 2009 @ 12:00 am (no subject)
Just finished watching Lord Of War. I was pretty excited to see it, since I've always liked Nick Cage, though I'm not entirely sure what it is about him I like. Most of the movies I see him in aren't that amazing, though he seems to work on projects that he really has a genuine interest in, which I think is really cool. Still, this movie, geeze this movie. I'd heard that it hadn't been popular upon release because it had been too much for people already fed up with war. I can certainly see how it could have been too much for people. About a fifth of the lines are actors trying their best to personify very difficult and complex characters while simultaneously wedging extremely specific facts about the weapons trade into it. It's like the worst product placement, though it's for a good cause. While it entails a bit of suspension of disbelief that stats about mortality rates and guns are spouted off at random by african dictators and prostitutes, even good actors have a hard time making it seem at all subtle. The whole thing went through periods of extreme preachyness, which is awkward since the main character is supposed to be a bad guy. He's supposed to be an amoral merchant of death. He's the worst of the bad guys, since he's putting gas in the engine that destroys lives. However, Nick Cage has that look about him that really always makes him sympathetic, and it's hard to follow his life and not feel a smidge of empathy for him. There are points where he's genuinely human, and it doesn't suit the movie's conceit or purpose at all. There's a lot of lessons flying everywhere, but the only ones he's concerned with are the lessons about dealing arms well. The final conclusion is the main character deciding that the worst thing is to be at war with yourself, and that you have to be who you really are, which is a great message in a movie where you aren't an international arms dealer. I thought the whole point of the movie was that you SHOULDN'T be an international arms dealer. Now, if this was some sort of tongue-in-cheek movie where the trade in weapons is just established as what is done and the story is actually about his character's development as a person, like a coming of age story with machine guns, then that would be great, but in a movie with such a massive message, it hardly needed any more.

In fact, I spent half of the movie wishing Samuel L. Jackson would show up as the mailman from Don't Be a Menace, shouting "MESSAGE" every time someone put on their lemon face to talk about the horrors of violence.



Also I'm kinda sick of movies that are 90% voiceover. For some reason every Nick Cage movie has to be extremely voiceover-heavy and it really doesn't work for me.
About this Entry
[info]patchworkhero
Dec. 23rd, 2009 @ 09:49 pm (no subject)
OMG You guys, guess what my BFF got me for Christmas?

Doctor Who, Series 2!

Woo hoo doesn't quite cover it.

She thought I already had series 1. I told her 2 was great because it is David Tennant's start. I may get on for myself after the holidays.

Anyway...So happy. It has the video diaries and the confidentials and some of my favourite episodes. School Reunion, for one. Probably won't watch Love and Monsters or Fear Her quite as much as the others but - OMG I HAS DOCTOR WHO ON DVD!

Yay.
About this Entry
[info]charliesmum
Dec. 23rd, 2009 @ 08:56 pm Ten Philosophical Questions to Ask About Buddhism
Professor Richard Hayes - a notable Buddhist scholar specializing in the Buddhist logicians Dignaga and Dharmakirti - has a series of ten talks delivered at Leiden University discussing ten very interesting philosophical questions that one could ask about Buddhism. Enjoy.

Leiden Lectures
About this Entry
[info]dharma_ben, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 23rd, 2009 @ 11:22 pm (no subject)



By the way, Happy Gesulentday!
About this Entry
[info]satan_hitler, posting in [info]buddhists
Dec. 23rd, 2009 @ 03:39 pm (no subject)
Collingswood Shakespeare Presents Wars of the Roses

Press release was put on Theatre Alliance, so I thought I'd share.

this is what it says, for those who can't link to the, er, link )

I would like to point out that I wrote the press release, thank you. (with help from my friends who edited it for me)
About this Entry
[info]charliesmum
Dec. 23rd, 2009 @ 08:40 pm The Woodenfish Program
Sponsored by Fo Guang Shan, the Woodenfish program aims to advance Humanistic Buddhism through a series of projects geared toward young adults. Woodenfish works with them to promote a spiritual, academic, and socially relevant understanding of Buddhism.

Room and board at Fo Guang Shan Monastery will be provided free of charge to participants for the duration of the program. Students will live in guest housing on the monastery grounds. Most meals will be taken in the main dining hall with the assembly of monks and nuns, and students will be taught proper monastic dining etiquette. During the cultural tour, participants will stay at Fo Guang Shan branch temples throughout the island of Taiwan. Due to the intensive nature of the program, dependents (spouses, children, and/or partners) will not be able to accompany participants.

http://www.woodenfish.org/


Foguangshan, one of the largest Buddhist organizations in the world, organizes the above program and it is free of charge. There is also a winter program that takes place in California. See the link on the site for info.
About this Entry
[info]ocha_no_hanashi, posting in [info]buddhists